
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION & INFORMATION
Stark County Trail and Greenway Plan
| INTRODUCTION | |
| The Stark County Park District has initiated construction of a network of greenway corridors to connect the countys parks, open spaces, cultural features, and historic sites. Designed to enhance the countys environmental and
economic resources, these multi-purpose recreational trails will offer a wide range of benefits
to those who will use them for bicycling, horse back riding, hiking, walking and nature
appreciation.
Not only will they serve as a recreational resource, they will also function as an important educational resource to promote water quality, natural resource conservation, historic restoration, and the preservation of wildlife habitat. The trails also are expected to serve as a catalyst for economic revitalization of local communities. This plan to establish a countywide trial system throughout Stark County is ambitious yet achievable. Its realization will depend upon a collaborative effort, similar to the one which has been used to develop the Ohio & National Heritage Canalway in western Stark County. The Stark County Park District has constructed this recreational trail on the historic towpath with the assistance of a Canal Corridor Implementation and Operation Task Force, a committee with representativesfrom all of the political jurisdictions located along the trail. The Stark County Trail and Greenway Plan serves as a companion to the Stark County Canal Corridor Master Plan. The evolution of the countywide trail plan began in 1997. Public support for the concept of a network of trails was demonstrated with passage of .5-mill tax levies in May 1997. The second phase of planning has included identification of potential trail routes and greenway, design guidelines and implementation recommendations. Community involvement has been a key component of the process, and periodic citizen review of building plans continues to be a key component of the implementation process. The following is a summary of the planning strategies recommended to implement The Stark County Trail and Greenway Plan, and is intended as an implementation guide for local communities. Based on geographic units, this design does not
reflect political boundaries. Individual communities may be included in several sections of trails. This approach allows for sections to be considered as units based on natural and cultural characteristics rather than boundaries associated with political jurisdictions. Greenway and trail development is an evolutionary process, and therefore,
will require periodic review. This document is a guideline and will similarly require
review and refinement as the trail and greenway system develops. |
|
GOALS OF THE PLAN |
|
The objective of The Stark County
Trail and Greenway Plan is to improve the quality of life for citizens and
visitors of Stark County by:
Greenways typically follow stream channels and utility or rail right of ways. The majority of greenways incorporate a multi-purpose trail as a central spine. The trails are usually off-road, although some routes take advantage of rural roadways or downtown streets. Existing commercial zones or public use facilities with restrooms and parking are dispersed throughout the system to serve as trail heads and rest areas. |
NATURAL, CULTURAL AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES |
|
| Stark County has a broad range of diverse
natural and cultural assets. The trail and greenway plan incorporates these resources,
using them as the central organizing feature. Predominantly rural in nature, Stark County is interspersed with small towns and several sizeable population centers.
The City of Canton is the urban hub in the center of the county. This area offers several major cultural attractions including the Professional Football Hall of Fame, McKinley National Museum, and the Canton Civic Center. Other population centers include Massillon, North Canton, Louisville, and Alliance. The small towns of Hartville, Limaville, East Canton, Minerva, Waynsburg, Magnolia, Navarre and East Sparta each have a unique charm founded on their own distinct character and history. All offer historic town centers with interesting architecture. Quail Hollow State Park in the northern part of the county, as well as Deer Creek and Walborn Reservoirs in the northeast, are significant natural resources available for recreational use. Predominant natural features of Stark County are rolling terrain and stream channels. The Tuscarawas River runs north to south along the western third of the county and is a central feature of the Ohio and Erie Canal Corridor. As the major tributary leading from the Tuscarawas River, the Nimishillen Creek has several branches that extend across the county. The creek and its tributaries offer ideal opportunities for greenways and have been identified for future recreational trails. Stark County is in the unique position of having a remarkable base of existing assets upon which to build a countywide system of regional significance:
|
|
|
|
| The overall design concept for the Stark
County Trail and Greenway Plan is to provide connections between the cultural and
natural resources and the population centers of the county. These connections will
minimally consist of a multi-use trail, and when feasible, a natural greenway corridor.
The trails would be off road, when possible or would incorporate the existing road system when
feasible. When an existing road is specified, the recreational lanes are separated from
the traffic lanes unless the road is a rural, low-volume route. The trails are designed as
multi-purpose, usable for hiking, biking and horseback riding. The natural areas or
greenways are often along stream, utility or rail corridors and require varying degrees of
restoration and ecological enhancement. Such improvements are considered part of the
overall plan. Several sections extend the length of the county and have the potential to
become regional attractions.
Other sections will be improved to serve as neighborhood connectors, providing access to the
system from the population centers. Trail heads and activity centers are dispersed
throughout the system and take advantage of existing public use facilities and commercial
districts. Special consideration is given to showcase the unique character and
history of small towns. |
|
| Recommended trail routes and greenways are
in public and private ownership. When in private ownership, the individual owner will
determine the nature of participation. If cooperative agreements can be reached with
private landowners, many of the trails will remain off road. If this is not possible,
alternative routes will be pursued. It is recommended that local communities establish
protection mechanisms and incentives for the establishment of the greenways. |
|
|
|
| Priorities of the Stark County
Trail and Greenway Plan will be phased in over time and requires partnerships between
local communities, private landowners, commercial developers, and regional agencies. The
Stark County Park District has taken the leadership for planning and implementating this plan. As such, the Stark County Park District has identified a basis for
determining priority projects. First, the Park District will address land already owned by
the district, followed by land that is in other forms of public ownership. Projects that
extend sections already underway or completed will be given priority, as will sections
within communities which demonstrate an interest to partners with the Park District in developing the resource
Communities will be expected to undertake construction of local trails within their communities, such as neighborhood loops and downtown walking tours. The Stark County Park District will serve as a technical resource for these activities, as well as providing financial support when feasible.The Stark County Park District currently employs two in-house trail building crews and equipment. The Park District's focus will be on trail development of public land, consummation of cooperative land use agreements, as well as an ongoing public awareness campaign and capital development. |
|
|
|
The first step toward implementation of the recommendations in this plan will be for local communities to review the suggestions for their areas and determine their interest in participating. Proposed trail routes that cross several communities may require a collaborative approach between local jurisdictions. Initial meetings within many communities were conducted as part of this planning process, and can be taken as an early indication of public support. Community meetings, local news articles, public education and discussion will all be needed throughout the building process. Finally, a local committee must be formed to spearhead outreach activities and focus community interests. |
|
| Establish a Local Committee | |
| The local committee should incorporate a
cross section of community interests, including expertise in physical construction, fund
development and local politics and should reflect the local historic, conservation,
recreation, and economic development interests. This group may be an ad hoc group of
interested citizens or may be set up as a standing committee of the local community
government. If a committee already exists, it will be important to evaluate its
composition to reflect an adequate diversity of interests.
Initially the local committee will need to take on several activities simultaneously. These activities will change as the process evolves, and include community education, research, achieving local support and commitment, and determining priorities and specific design details. Later, activities may focus on fund development, event programming, volunteer construction projects, and development of local protection mechanisms. If you are interested in serving on a local committee, contact your local park department, mayor or township trustees. |
|
| Local Support and Commitment | |
| Implementation of this plan will require a
solid base of community support that understands the benefits of trails and greenways.
Local officials and citizens will need to understand the details of what is being
proposed. Tours of proposed routes, maps published in local papers, displays at local
events, local speaking engagements, and local school activities are all ways which can be
used to communicate the value of a trail system and gain support.
The local committee in each area will determine the extent of local support and commitment. Meetings with business and political leaders and other local constituencies will be helpful. In some cases, a strong attendance at community functions and events that focus on the trail system may be enough to demonstrate local support. In other cases, public opinion surveys or official adoption of the plan and commitment of resources will be appropriate. All types of activities undertaken will be supported by an ongoing public awareness campaign conducted by the Stark County Park District. |
|
| Research | |
| Property research will need to be conducted for
each proposed trail. Owners will need to be identified and approached to
determine their interest in the project. Historic and natural features along each route
also needs to be documented.
This research can be used as a basis for school activities or community group outings. Additional research is needed to determine the extent of local land use protections, such as flood plains and wetland areas. Officially designated historic sites enjoy some measure of protection as well. Local governments may be able to strengthen these protections. Finally, the proposed trails and greenways must be compatible with local recreation and open space plans. |
|
| Setting Local Priorities | |
Local committees need to establish a strategy for identifying priorities. The Stark County Park District has prioritized projects based on ownership of land. Sections of trail in public ownership, such as those within local parks, are the easiest to implement. They can be used as pilot projects to demonstrate trail and greenway benefits. Pilot projects also are an effective public awareness tool. Specific developments to enhance the usability of the trail such as trailhead parking or a commercial establishment to sell refreshments or fishing bait may also provide to be strategic priorities. Consummation of land use agreements for private lands within the system are an additional priority. The committee should review the plan and identify the next step for their section of the system: such as land use agreement, trail clearing, surface improvement, parking lot paving. |
|
| Design Refinement and Coordination | |
| During the above planning process, improvements such as culverts or crosswalks will be identified. The local committee should bring these items to the attention of the road and engineering departments. They may be able to integrate the improvement within already scheduled public improvements. In some cases, these may precede actual trail or greenway development. | |
| Moore, Roger L.; Graefe, Alan R.; Gitelson, Richard; and Porter, Elizabeth.1992. The Impacts of Rail-Trails: A Study of the Users and Property Owners from Three Trails. U. S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, River & Trails Conservation Program. |
| National Park Service, Midwest Region. 1993. The Ohio 7 Erie Canal Corridor Study: A Route to Prosperity. |
| Ryan, Karen-Lee; Flink, Charles A.; Lagerwey, Peter; Balmori, Diana; and Stearns, Robert M. 1993. Trails for the Twenty-first Century: Planning, Design, and Management Manual for Multi-Use Trails. Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, Washington, D.C. and Island Press, Washington, D.C. |
| The Impacts of Rail-Trails: A Study of Users and Nearby Property Owners from Three Trails. National Park Service, Rivers and Trail Conservation Assistance Program, Washington, D.C., 1992. |
| Stokes, Samuel N., A. Elizabeth Watson, Genevieve Keller, and Timothy J. Keller, Saving Americas Countryside: A Guide to Rural Conservation. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1989. |
| Fedelchak, Marilyn, and Byrd Wood, Protecting Americas Countryside. National Trust for Historic Preservation, Washington, D. C., 1988. |
| The Impacts of Rail Trails. National Park Service Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program, Washington, D.C., 1992. |
| Economic Impacts of Protecting Rivers, Trails and Greenway Corridors: A Resource Book. Rivers and Trails Conservation Assistance Program, National Park Service, Washington, D.C. 1990. Outlines the many economic benefits of greenway creation, from increased property values, recreational opportunities, tourism, and quality of life, to reduced public spending on infrastructure, hazard mitigation, and pollution control. |
| Little, Charles, Greenways for America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1990. The book on the greenway movement. Case studies of diverse projects. Excellent listing of resources. |
| Starting a Land Trust. The Land Trust Alliance, Washington, D.C., 1990. Provides case studies, an extensive list of resources, sample documents, and additional sources of assistance. |
| Smith, Daniel, and Paul Hellmund, eds., The Ecology of Greenways. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, in press (expected publication 1993). |